Skip to main content
[AGENT-SAFETY]

Agent Environment Security

AI agents run with real permissions. XOR verifies tool configurations, sandbox boundaries, and credential exposure.

[AGENT SECURITY]

Agent environment isolation and supply chain verification

OutcomeBlock compromised tools and unsafe patches before they reach your codebase.

MechanismXOR verifies agent tool configurations, sandbox boundaries, and credential exposure before the agent runs.

Proof36.82% of agent skills in public marketplaces contain security vulnerabilities (Snyk ToxicSkills).

Agent tools run autonomously

Agents use third-party tools and plugins with real permissions. If a tool is compromised, the agent inherits that exposure. XOR checks tool configurations before the agent runs.

Supply chain risks

36.82% of agent skills in public marketplaces contain security vulnerabilities (Snyk ToxicSkills). Unsigned traces are spoofable. Supply chain transparency standards provide non-repudiation.

36.82%
Agent tools with known vulnerabilities
8
Risk categories analyzed
3
Security layers

Three ways agents can be compromised

AI coding agents have three risk areas that traditional security tools do not cover:

The agent itself

Can it be tricked into writing malicious code? Does it follow instructions hidden in untrusted repository files?

The tools it calls

The plugins, tools, and servers the agent connects to. 36.82% of published agent tools contain known vulnerabilities. A compromised tool compromises the agent.

The output it produces

Does the generated fix introduce new issues? Does it actually resolve the original bug? XOR checks both.

How XOR protects each layer

Layer 1: Agent isolation

Each agent runs in an isolated container with strict security restrictions. No access to the host filesystem, network, or other containers.

$ xor run --isolated agent-config.json

agent attempting system access...

SANDBOX: access denied — security violation

container terminated (exit 137)

Layer 2: Tool scanning

Before an agent runs, XOR scans the tools and plugins it uses against known vulnerability databases and only allows trusted tools.

$ xor scan --tools agent-config.json

Scanning 12 tool configurations...

⚠ filesystem-tool: known vulnerability (path traversal)

⚠ network-tool: known vulnerability (server-side request forgery)

✓ 10 tools clean

Action: block vulnerable tools, enforce approved list

Layer 3: Output verification

After the agent produces a fix, XOR writes a verifier for the vulnerability and runs safety checks. This catches both failed fixes and newly introduced issues.

See

how verification works

for the full pipeline.

The 36.82% finding

A Snyk audit of 3,984 agent skills found 36.82% contain at least one security flaw and 13.4% have critical issues including credential theft and data exfiltration (source: Snyk ToxicSkills, Feb 2026). This includes tools for file access, network requests, and code execution. An agent using a vulnerable tool can be exploited by a malicious repository — the repository doesn't need to attack the agent directly.

This is why XOR checks every agent's tools before any PR ships.

Threat model

Malicious instructions hidden in repository files

Sandboxed execution, no access to sensitive files

Compromised tools stealing data

Scoped permissions, network isolation, approved tool lists

Agent escaping its sandbox

Multiple security layers + read-only filesystem

Tampered or unsigned agent tools

Signature verification, dependency scanning

Agent introducing backdoors in fixes

Safety checks, bug re-run, manual audit flag

Poisoned training data affecting agent behavior

Independent benchmark with known-good fixes

[NEXT STEPS]

Secure your agent deployment

FAQ

What is agent environment isolation?

AI agents run with real permissions. Isolation checks confirm agent tool configurations, sandbox boundaries, and credential exposure before the agent runs.

What does XOR verify in agent environments?

XOR verifies agent tool configurations, sandbox boundaries, credential exposure, and supply-chain integrity for skills and plugins.

Why is agent safety different from application security?

Agents have autonomous execution. A vulnerable agent tool or misconfigured sandbox gives an agent access it should not have. This requires isolation verification, not just code scanning.

How vulnerable are agent environments today?

36.82% of agent skills in public marketplaces contain security vulnerabilities (Snyk ToxicSkills). Unsigned traces are spoofable. Supply chain transparency standards (IETF SCITT and RATS) provide non-repudiation and provenance.

[RELATED TOPICS]

Patch verification

XOR writes a verifier for each vulnerability, then tests agent-generated patches against it. If the fix passes, it ships. If not, the failure feeds back into the agent harness.

Automated vulnerability patching

AI agents generate fixes for known CVEs. XOR verifies each fix and feeds outcomes back into the agent harness so future patches improve.

Benchmark Results

50.7% pass rate. $4.16 per fix. Real data from 1,224 evaluations.

Benchmark Results

50.7% pass rate. $4.16 per fix. Real data from 1,224 evaluations.

Agent Cost Economics

Fix vulnerabilities for $4.16–$87 with agents. 100x cheaper than incident response. Real cost data.

Agent Configurations

9 agent-model configurations evaluated on real CVEs. Compare Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and OpenCode.

Benchmark Methodology

How CVE-Agent-Bench evaluates 9 coding agents on 136 real vulnerabilities. Deterministic, reproducible, open methodology.

Security Economics for Agentic Patching

Security economics for agentic patching. ROI models backed by verified pass/fail data and business-impact triage.

Automated Vulnerability Patching and PR Review

Automated code review, fix generation, GitHub Actions hardening, safety checks, and learning feedback. One-click install on any GitHub repository.

Continuous Learning from Verified Agent Runs

A signed record of every agent run. See what the agent did, verify it independently, and feed the data back so agents improve.

Signed Compliance Evidence for AI Agents

A tamper-proof record of every AI agent action. Produces evidence for SOC 2, EU AI Act, PCI DSS, and more. Built on open standards so auditors verify independently.

Compliance Evidence and Standards Alignment

How XOR signed audit trails produce evidence for SOC 2, EU AI Act, PCI DSS, NIST, and other compliance frameworks.

See which agents produce fixes that work

136 CVEs. 9 agents. 1,224 evaluations. Agents learn from every run.